Make Your Shopping Count. A percentage of each purchase goes to the CAP Ministry.


RED does not mean "stop." GREEN does not mean "go." Click on the CAPCon Alert image for explanation
CAP Movie Ministry
A ministry of the ChildCare Action Project:
Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry)
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Christian Ministry.
Entertainment Media Analysis Report
A service to His little ones through you in His name by His Word


(2007), PG-13 [Strong PG-13*] (1hr 43min)

Final Score
Analysis Date
Date Posted
Influence Density
September 29, 2007
October 13, 2007

The #1 Christian entertainment media analysis service on the Internet. We give you OBJECTIVE tools NO ONE ELSE CAN to help YOU make an informed decision for yourself whether a film is fit for your family. Over 1100 analyses for parents, grandparents, pastors, youth leaders and more.
Give your visitors full access to over 1100 CAP movie analyses! Place this image on your website and link it to

Click it to try it!

PLEASE . . . . . . .

(a PayPal account is NOT required)
OR (preferred) by Check or Money Order.
The CAP is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit Christian ministry. Donations to us are TAX-DEDUCTIBLE

Stay informed ...OBJECTIVELY...
on what Hollywood feeds your kids. SUBSCRIBE
(or unsubscribe)
to our FREE text-only email version of these reports and our COMING SOON notices.
Email this report to friends and
tell them about the CAP Ministry:

Christian Long Distance

(While the Scriptural references are certainly not subjective, my commentary may be and sometimes is somewhat subjective.)

If Scriptural references appear, the full text appears at the end of the Summary / Commentary.

(2007), PG-13 [Strong PG-13*] ...teen flick of contempt for wholesome morality swirling among the "good messages."

Cast/Crew Details Courtesy Internet Movie Database
Production (US): Morgan Creek Productions, SW7D Productions, Clifford Werber Productions
Distribution (US): Morgan Creek International, Universal Pictures
Director(s): Joe Nussbaum
Producer(s): Guy McElwaine, Wayne Morris, Dara Resnik, David C. Robinson, James G. Robinson, Clifford Werber
Written by: Chad Creasey
Cinematography/Camera: Mark Irwin
Music: Deborah Lurie
Film Editing: Danny Saphire
Casting: Pam Dixon
Production Design: Mark Garner
Art Direction: Andrew White
Viewed At: Driftwood Theater 6

Sydney White  appears to be a concoction of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves  (hint: production in part by SW7D) with Animal House  (to add poop to the recipe), Revenge of the Nerds, a dozen other college social/sexual warfare movies and Mean Girls poured in. Names have been changed to protect the innocent. And I suspect Sydney White  is an attempt to revive Amanda Bynes' earlier successes (or attempts at success) with, for example, What a Girl Wants, Big Fat Liar and She's the Man.

College-bound 18 year old Sydney White (Amanda Bynes), daughter of widower Paul (John Schneider), a plumber, whose mother, Deb Lee (not seen) died when Sydney was nine years old, is keen on getting into the same prestigious sorority as her mother, the Kappa Phi Nu. That Sydney's mother was a Kappa makes Sydney a "legend" and practically a shoe-in if it were not for Rachel Witchburn (Sara Paxton), Kappa and student body president and her goons. All the Kappa girls look like Barbie(tm) dolls with blonde hair and size two clothes ... what there is of them at times, just like Rachel. Sydney does not fit that mold. Rachel wants Sydney to fail the obligatory initiation into Kappa but Sydney meets all the conditions and tests. Rachel is forced to admit Sydney into Kappa Phi.

But after becoming accepted into Kappa Phi Nu, Sydney is manipulated by Rachel and her mean-spirited pranks and is eventually ousted. Now Sydney is looking for a place to stay since she had lost her dorm room after joining Kappa Phi.

To the rescue are the seven dork "dwarves" of the Vortex house: George (Arnie Pantoja), Jeremy (Adam Hendershott), Lenny (Jack Carpenter), Gurkin (Danny Strong), Embele (Donte Bonner), Spanky (Samm Levine) and Terrence (Jeremy Howard). The Vortex is a run-down soon to be condemned house at the end of greek row that is seen by the greeks as less than a wart, The greeks want the spot for a new activity center.

This is where the take-off on Snow White and the Seven Dwarves  materializes the most. Sydney is, of course, "Show White." One of the guys in the Vortex, I think it was Embele, is almost always sleepy because of what the film called jet lag. But there is ugly contrast with the original Snow White. In strongest contrast with the original purity of Disney's production is Spanky, a womanizer with one thing on his mind who blurts comments such as "This fabric has touched breasts" about Sydney's bra hanging in the closet. I do not remember any of the original seven dwarves being called "Lusty."

About that "This fabric has touched breasts" comment. It is not that far-fetched, mom/dad, for teen boys to think like that nowadays in this culture of AWOL and even amoral sexual standards. Today's teens are hit with such programing from every angle every day from movies, music, advertisements and even school books. Such comments in and as entertainment draw attention of the viewer to private parts and to sexual thoughts. That is why we include a performed wearing only underwear in the scoring of a film Just because deodorant and shower gel commercials capitalize on the new-found freedom to broadcast people in underwear to the consuming public does not make doing so pure. Consider this. During such a commercial, where do your eyes go when someone only in underwear appears onscreen? Hmmm? The character's feet? The deodorant or shower gel? And to put a finer point on that, when was the last time you saw such a commercial with an old fat man or woman wearing only her underwear? Someday I'll tell you about "exposure to below-navel skin" and "dressing to maximize the human body an/or skin exposure" in and as teen entertainment.

Anyway, the seven Vortex "dwarves" took Sydney in. Then along comes Tyler Prince (Matt Long), the president of the Beta Omega Pi fraternity and ex-boyfriend of Rachel (ex- for him anyway), whose stage name alone sets him up as the "handsome prince." He does come to the rescue but only after cohorting with the "evil queen" Rachel unbeknownst to Sydney. Unbeknownst or a while ...

During her stay with the "seven dwarfs" Sydney launches a campaign against incumbent Rachel to become student body president to restore time-honored character and tradition. While Rachel is underhanded and self-serving in just about everything she does, Sydney is polite and honorable.

Of trivia interest, like part of Clinton's campaign for US President, Sydney's campaign openly included homosexual practitioners. Probably for the same reason -- votes. The portrayal of homosexual practitioners did not include any demonstrations of homosexual behavior except the stereotype of transvestism and effeminate mannerisms. Nonetheless, this film promotes the practice of homosexuality, however lightly, by including it, leading to yet more desensitization of youth away from God's Word about such practice by saturating as much of the public eye with it as possible, portraying it as another harmless choice of behavior. Harmless the practice of homosexuality is not A choice it is. Every single non-autonomic movement of the human body is a choice. No exceptions. No debate. To avoid anyone thinking this is hate speech about homosexual practitioners, it is not about the practitioner. It is about the practice. The chosen behavior. S/he who chooses to practice homosexuality is as precious to Jesus as s/he who does not. It is not us God hates, it is some of our behaviors He hates. By His Word. Not mine. Not yours. [1Cor. 6:9-10, Jude 1:7]

If you've seen the previews you've seen enough to fill in the blanks in this teen flick of contempt for wholesome morality swirling among the "good messages.". Sydney White  did earn a score equivalent to the scores earned by PG-13 films in the comparative baseline database but remember that "PG-13" is just a slice off the top of "R." Indeed, two of the six investigation areas found material to earn scores equivalent to some R rated movies.

The "poisoned apple" of this film is not so much from Rachel by her hateful antics but is the film itself and its plethora of assaults on morality and decency. Summary discussion of the poison is provided below in the individual investigation area summaries. Understand, however, that the most complete representation of the content found in this film is provided in the Findings/Scoring section.

Wanton Violence/Crime (W)
The only issue of content that even approaches violent or criminal activity is the stuffing of the ballot box. Rules are rules and s/he who does not compete by the rules is not a victor even if s/he wins. [2Tim. 2:5]

Impudence/Hate (I)
Twenty-one times some form of the three/four letter word vocabulary is uttered to the ears of your young teens who watch this show. About every five minutes someone cusses. Conceit [Phil. 2:3, Rom. 12:16] and socially cruel warfare are constant [Prov. 11:17].

Sexual Immorality (S)
Filled with some form of sexually-oriented content of one kind or another, this film is a danger to wholesome thought and demeanor. Images that challenge modesty do nothing but lead the thoughts into impurity. What goes on the outside comes from the inside. [Mark 7:21, 1 John 2:26] Some of that which was chosen for the outside for some of the performers by the filmmakers were certainly intended to be seductive, sensual or anatomically exhibitionistic: dressing to maximize the female form and/or skin exposure; excessive cleavage, nudity with the genitals hidden by convenience objects. A number of other matters to focus the viewer on sexually-oriented matters included camera angle to force the viewer on private parts, women in towels only, scant swim wear, etc..

Drugs/Alcohol (D)
A drinking party plus a guzzling contest were expensive to the Drugs/Alcohol investigation area. This is NOT an example to set for young teens anticipating college. It is bad news. Why? Since you've asked, I'll tell you.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) has found that exposure to booze and drinking in and as entertainment emboldens the viewer, in particular the middle school age stratum, the PG and PG-13 age stratum, to challenge and experiment with alcohol.

Though the ACP study used R-rated films since it was believed R-rated films contained the most drinking, the focus is on the influence of exposure to alcohol in and as entertainment regardless of the film rating. Besides, the ACP researchers were not aware of R-13 which defeats the assumption that R-rated films present the most drinking and drunkenness. A finding by Harvard University agreed with our R-13 finding, four years after our finding. As a sidebar note, consider this, too. The MPAA is apparently going to consider all films with smoking in them as R-rated, clearly announcing without trying that smoking in and as entertainment is indeed a negative influence. If so, why not make R-rated any films which present booze and/or drinking and/or drunkenness? [Eph. 5:18] We incorporated smoking into a film's scoring distribution long before  the MPAA. Even other film rating websites have plagiarized our methodology. Might that imply others are following our lead? That we are doing something right?

Within the ACP study population of 4544 middle school students (90% were under fourteen years old), the prevalence of having tried alcohol without parental knowledge was

  • 46% for those with no restrictions on which rating may be viewed
  • 16% for those with partial restrictions on which rating may be viewed
  • four percent for those with complete restrictions.

    Rather revealing of the influences of the entertainment industry wouldn't you say? And emboldening children to sin with drink in and as entertainment screams of violating Luke 17:2.

    I can add to the ACP study that reveals films which present drinking and drunkenness contribute to underage alcohol abuse. I submit that it is not so much the presence of alcohol in films or the rating of the film(s) that embolden youth to abuse it, but is rather the attitude portrayed: the attitude of freedom from authority, freedom from accountability and freedom from consequences. PG-13 and R-rated films, even lesser rated films, are typically heavy with attitude. Our report on this, ATTITUDE: In Perspective -- Investigation Area Scoring and Trend in CAP Entertainment Industry Investigations, Special Report-001 may provide more understanding of the point.

    Offense to God (O)
    Four times someone utters God's name in vain. Though each time was without the four letter expletive, such minimization does not minimize the sin of using His name in vain. [Deut. 5:11]

    Murder/Suicide (M)
    No murders or suicides were noted.


    If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ] or bold. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page.


  • 1 Cor. 6:9 - 10 Know ye not that the [unforgiven] unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators [pornos: a man who prostitutes his body to another's lust for hire, a male prostitute, a man who indulges in immoral sexual intercourse], nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate [malakos: he who keeps a boy kept for homosexual relations (such as the North American Man-boy Love Association - NAMBLA); a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness; a male prostitute], nor abusers of themselves with mankind [arsenokoites: a man who lies with another male as with a female, sodomite, homosexual practitioner], Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. ["Female" can be used in place of "Male".]
  • Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication [sexual immorality such as pre- and extra-marital sex], and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire [if unforgiven]. ["Flesh" is sarx: the sensuous nature of man. "Going after strange flesh" when applied to Sodom and Gomorrha is the practice of (the "going after") homosexuality (of "strange flesh") and other non-heterosexual practices. The bottom line: any sexual contact (including visual), conduct or activity outside a monogamous heterosexual marriage is immoral.]
  • 2Tim. 2:5 Similarly, if anyone competes as an athlete, he does not receive the victor's crown unless he competes according to the rules.
  • Phil. 2:3 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves.
  • Rom. 12:16 Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.
  • Prov. 11:17 A kind man benefits himself, but a cruel man brings trouble on himself.
  • Mark 7:21 For from within, out of men's hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery,
  • 1 John 2:26 These things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you. ["These things I have written" includes lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes from 1 John 2:16. An example of "them that seduce you" includes they who demonstrate sexual sin, however innocuous it may seem, in and as entertainment which can morally "seduce" the viewer, can lead one astray by desensitizing one and emboldening him/her to believe sexually immoral deeds, thoughts and display are acceptable OR by eroding one's natural inhibition against sexually immoral deeds and thoughts. And anything in and as entertainment that draws the viewer's attention to sexuality, sexual deeds, nudity and the private parts clothed or not, seen or not, is sexual.]
  • Eph. 5:18 Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery. Instead, be filled with the Spirit. [Since "drunk" is methusko {meth-oos'-ko}: to intoxicate; make drunk; to get drunk; become intoxicated, "wine" can be any intoxicating substance including illegal drugs or abuse of prescription drugs. The issue is do not abuse the body by intoxicating it. Though it is not a sin to drink, it is a sin to get drunk OR to influence to get drunk OR to drink in defiance such as underage drinking.
  • Deut. 5:11 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain: for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. [Vain is shav' {shawv}: emptiness, nothingness, vanity, such as an expletive. With or without the four letter expletive, the use of God's name in any way other than respect, reverence or responsible discussion is in vain. That includes the popular three syllable sentence with His name trailing it AND the misuse of Jesus' name or title.]

    ***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry***
  • Jer. 37:9 This is what the LORD says: Do not deceive yourselves, thinking, 'The Babylonians [the destroyers from within] will surely leave us.' They will not!
  • Ps. 12:8 The wicked freely strut about [e.g., create progressively vile/offensive entertainment with impunity and no consequences and present it to younger and younger audiences every year] when what is vile is honored among men [when enough people continue to defend it, embrace it, enjoy it, want it, submit to it. I call attention to Ps. 12:8 to warn of the creeping desensitizing power of "entertainment."]
  • Col. 2:8 Beware lest any man [by his influence] spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
  • 1 Cor. 15:33 Be not deceived: evil [kakov: of a bad nature, not such as it ought to be] communications corrupt good manners.
  • Rom. 5:19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
  • Jude 1:4 For there are certain men* crept in unawares [secretly slipped in among us], who were before of old ordained to this condemnation [whose condemnation was written about long ago], ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness [a license for immorality], and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. [*men: anthropos {anth'-ro-pos}, generic, a human being, whether male or female]
  • Matt. 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
  • Luke 17:2 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones. [Offend: skandalizo {skan-dal-id'-zo} - scandalize; to entice to sin; to cause a person to begin to distrust and desert one whom he ought to trust and obey; to cause to fall away.]
  • Ps. 119:133 Order my steps in thy word: and let not any iniquity have dominion over me [let no sin rule over me].
  • John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
  • 1 Thess. 5:22 Abstain from all appearance of evil. ["Evil" includes all things that are sinful.]


    As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie.
    (The objective  heart of the CAP Analysis Model, independent of and insulated from the Summary / Commentary section.)

    Sydney White (2007) CAP Thermometers

    Wanton Violence/Crime (W)
  • 21 uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary
  • conceit throughout
  • social cruelty/warfare throughout
  • lying to father, twice
  • punk, repeatedly
  • massive tattoos
  • goth, repeatedly

    Impudence/Hate (I)
  • 21 uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary
  • conceit throughout
  • social cruelty/warfare throughout
  • lying to father, twice
  • punk, repeatedly
  • massive tattoos
  • goth, repeatedly

    Sexual Immorality (S)
  • rude gaze, staring with crude comments
  • exposure to below navel skin, repeatedly
  • dressing to maximize the female form and/or skin exposure, repeatedly
  • excessive cleavage, repeatedly
  • women in towels only
  • adults in underwear
  • crude humor
  • scant swim wear
  • crude sexual humor
  • camera angle to force viewer on private parts, repeatedly
  • use of sex appeal to manipulate
  • nudity with only genitals hidden and with convenience objects
  • portrayal of the acceptance of the practice of homosexuality and homosexual references/suggestions, repeatedly

    Drugs/Alcohol (D):
  • party fueled by drinking

    Offense to God (O)
  • four uses of God's name in vain without the four letter expletive

    Murder/Suicide (M)
  • none noted

    Interested parties, send us your proposal. Your link will appear on each new analysis report prepared during the desired period and, once placed on a page, will not be removed.

    There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings.

    The ChildCare Action Project (CAP) is a nonprofit Christian ministry. We rely on public support. If you wish to contribute to the CAP, please send your donations to
    ChildCare Action Project
    Post Office Box 177
    Granbury, TX 76048-0177

    Your gifts are tax deductible in accordance with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Tax Codes. Please feel free to write to us.

    You are welcome to go to the
    CAP Reports page
    or go to the
    Top of the CAP Home Page
    or the
    CAP Site Map (Table of Contents)
    or leave me an email message or comment at

    In the name of Jesus:
    Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read.

    Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God.
    Tom Carder
    ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture
    100% dependent on your tax-deductible financial support

    Copyright ChildCare Action Project (CAP) Ministry

    Since December 5, 2000

    Christian Long Distance
    The Fundamental Top 500

    We exist only by your tax-deductible donations. PLEASE

    Features PayPal! You do NOT need an account to donate.

    Copyright ChildCare Action Project (CAP) Ministry
    A Nonprofit Christian Ministry EIN: 75-2607488