Click on CAPCon Alert image for explanation
ChildCare Action Project:
Christian Analysis of American Culture (CAP Ministry)
Entertainment Media Analysis Report
A service to His little ones (which includes at-home teens) through you, their parents and grandparents, in His name by His Word

(2004), PG
Analysis Date
CAP Final Score
CAP Influence Density
June 12, 2004
51 out of 100

Give your visitors full access to over 850 CAP movie analyses! Place this image on your website and link it to

Click it to try it!

We exist only by your
tax-deductible donations.
PLEASE .......

Features PayPal!
Stay informed ...OBJECTIVELY...
on what Hollywood feeds your kids. SUBSCRIBE
to our FREE newsletter.
Please tell a friend about the
CAP Ministry:



If Scriptural references appear, the full text appears at the end of the Summary / Commentary likely using a mix of KJV and NIV.

(2004), PG-13 -- ... how men want to subdue and control their wives.

Cast/Crew Details Courtesy Internet Movie Database
Production (US): Paramount Pictures, Scott Rudin Productions, De Line Pictures, DreamWorks SKG
Distribution (US): Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks Distribution LLC, DreamWorks SKG, Paramount Pictures
Director(s): Frank Oz
Producer(s): Ronald M. Bozman, Leslie J. Converse, Donald De Line, Gabriel Grunfeld, Scott Rudin, Edgar J. Scherick, Keri Selig
Written by: Ira Levin (book)
Screenplay: Paul Rudnick
Cinematography/Camera: Rob Hahn
Music: David Arnold, David Mansfield, Dana Glover
Film Editing: Jay Rabinowitz
Casting: Laura Rosenthal, Juliet Taylor
Production Design: Jackson De Govia
Art Direction: Peter Rogness
Viewed At: Driftwood Theater 6

Please use this report cautiously. I dozed a minute or two. Though it is note likely, during those couple minutes there could have been a couple issues of assault on morality of any kind. Even so, this film still earned a score equivalent to some R-rated movies in the comparative baseline database, making it, too, an R-13 without the missed couple minutes.

In this remake of the 1975 movie, top TV executive for the EBS television network, Joanna Eberhard (Nicole Kidman) made a big mistake. She produced a reality TV show which tested the loyalty of a husband to his wife and she to he. The husbands were tested using prostitutes hired just for the show and the wives were tested using "hunks" in Tarzan(tm) dress.

When one husband/wife team were subjected to test of their fidelity, the husband chose to remain loyal to his wife while she, when voicing her choice admitted to adultery, chose the hunks over her husband. This made the husband flip his lid who later attempted to kill Eberhard. The upper echelon for EBS decided Eberhard was no longer the right stuff for EBS. By the way, lesbianism gets strategically and lightly inserted in this subplot, just to keep awareness of the alternate lifestyle alive, dontcha know. [Rom. 1:26]

By the way, regarding the alternate lifestyle, I just received notice by email that the republican-controlled Senate passed the hate crimes bill today (June 15, 2004). Now it goes to the House then to whomever, ultimately to the President. Hopefully, the House and/or the President will ensure the Constitution prevails and sanity rules. If the hate crime bill tells us that it is illegal to share God's Word with others as similar "laws" do in Sweden and Canada (Source: Concerned Women for America, "Mug Gramma Law"), it is a violation of the Constitution which gives us not only the freedom of speech but the freedom of religion. And this is all not to mention that if the hate crimes bill says it is illegal to share God's Word it is in violation of His Word. Please do not try to convince me the hate crimes bill has nothing to do with Christians preaching that the practice of homosexuality is a sin. If you read the article, note that Matthew Shepard's name figured sympathetically in the proceedings but not so with Jessie Dirkhising's name. Jessie was a 14 year old boy who was rape murdered, choked on his own underwear soaked in gasoline after being sodomized, by two homosexual practitioners. Of course, the Jessie Dirkhising event, which is only one of such events, seems to have escaped the watchful and vigilant eyes of the media. The North American Man-boy Love Association will love the hate crimes bill if it becomes law. And they will love your sons ... more ... if it does. And I doubt you will be able to say anything about it ... legally. And I can guess what you are thinking: "That is extremist thinking!" Is it really? We've come a long way, baby. In a short time.

And later in the show is a male homosexual pair. [1Cor. 6:9-10] One particularly offensive comment made by one of the two homosexual practitioners turned politician was when he claimed his homosexual "love" was "in the Lord" thus claiming a homosexual relationship as being blessed and nurtured by the Lord. Jesus never once sinned nor did He ever encourage anyone to participate in sin. Not once. Nor will He excuse any sin. He will forgive them all if we ask believing, but He will not excuse any. Even after Jesus forgave the prostitute, He did not excuse the sin of prostitution and reminded her of the sin of it by telling her to "Go. Sin no more." Jesus will not rewrite the Word just because it would fill our bellies for Him to do so.

Fired and depressed, Eberhard's understanding and sympathetic husband, Walter Kresby (Matthew Broderick) [Eberhard/Kresby? Husband and wife? That is interesting.] decided that what the family needed was to leave the big city for the serene country life. Walter quit his VP job with EBS just for Joanna to move her and their son and daughter to Stepford, Connecticut where idyllic was defined and exhibited and where crime and poverty were as absent as ants on a ski slope with new powder. Strangely enough, the Eberhard/Kresby kids seem to disappear somewhere in the show.

In Stepford the Kresby/Eberhards noted that all was so comfortable and well-to-do it was unnatural. All the wives in Stepford were as dutiful and unquestioning as the housewives in TV commercials from the 50s. "Get me a beer" resulted in a sickeningly obedient wife, smiling as plastic as a Barbie(tm) doll with equal life in her face, fetching a beer with gratitude that she could perform for her husband. And in keeping with the trend of PG-13 movies, one of the wives "serviced" her husband at about 120 decibels. Unseen as the romp might have been, there was no doubt.

The high point in the lives of the women was a group discussion of Christmas crafts while the men participated in grunting sessions amongst themselves in a secret society called the (originally enough) the Stepford Men's Association headed by Mike Wellington (Christopher Walken), the "father" of the Stepford society.

It is obvious about 20 minutes into the show that it is a satire of some notion of how men want to subdue and control their wives; to keep "the little women" subordinate to them. Toward the end of the show we find that the men wanted to subdue their powerful wives since all of the Stepford wives were once top executives, politicians, scientists and the like. There is the statement at the heart of the show; that the husbands felt threatened by the success of their wives and decided to counterfeit them in order to control them. We never see, though, how the plot handled the independence of the dissimilar married names, Eberhard/Kresby. It was always Walter and Joanna, never Mr. Kresby and Mrs. Eberhard or Mr. and Mrs. Kresby/Eberhard.

Joanna tied her best to conform to the outwardly gratifying discipline exuded by the Stepford wives. Almost making it to the same plateau of the Stepford wives, Joanna began to realize the sheer emptiness of such servitude. At the same time, Walter is almost remolded into the same cast as the other Stepford husbands but sanity prevails and how it prevails is up to you if you decide to watch this R-13 in spite of the listing in the Findings/Scoring section. As always, we tell you what is there, you decide. The ending is indeed a twist from what the plot leads the viewer to think.

The Stepford Wives is clearly a continuation of the social statement about the sexual freedom and "equal rights" movement of the 1975 version. The Bible gives clear and specific hierarchy of the family in Eph. 5:22-25, in Col. 3:18-19 and again in 1 Peter 3:1, 7-8. God has a rather elegant plan for husbands and wives and in no case does His plan place one dictatorial of the other. His plan simply defines our roles which, while being different, are to be complementary, not adversarial or competitive. Yes, the husband is the leader, but a good leader cannot be a good leader unless he knows how and when to be a good follower. And a good leader's leadership may be measured by the degree of agreement of the follower. Though in a romantic and light-hearted sense, think of this in the way My Big Fat Greek Wedding put it: that the husband is indeed the head of the wife but she is the neck which can turn the head any which way she chooses.

The Stepford Wives contained only four uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary but 11 uses of God's name in vain. Though all uses of God's name in vain were without the four letter expletive, God has very specific requirements about using His name in vain [Deut 5:11]. Sexual immorality consisted mainly of talk of it in various aspects, dressing to maximize the female form and/or skin exposure and excessive cleavage but a lot of it. The only nudity noted was of a number of mannequins. The listing in the Findings/Scoring section will tell all that was noted.


If needed to focus or fortify, applicable text is underlined or bracketed [ ]. If you wish to have full context available, the Blue Letter Bible is a convenient source. If you use the Blue Letter Bible, a new window will open. Close it to return here or use "Window" in your browser's menu bar to alternate between the CAP page and the Blue Letter Bible page.

  • Rom. 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
  • Eph. 5:22-25 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
  • Col. 3:18-19 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord. Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them.
  • 1 Pet. 3:1 Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation [anastrofe {an-as-trof-ay'}: manner of life, conduct, behaviour,] of the wives;
  • 1 Pet. 3:7-8 Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered. Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous:
  • 1Cor. 6:9-10 Do you not know that the [unforgiven] wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

    ***Selected Scriptures of Armour against the influence of the entertainment industry***
  • Ps. 12:8 The wicked freely strut about [e.g., create progressively vile/offensive entertainment with impunity and no consequences and present it to younger and younger audiences every year] when what is vile is honored among men [when enough people continue to defend it, embrace it, pay for it, enjoy it, want it, submit to it. I call attention to Ps. 12:8 to warn of the creeping desensitizing power of "entertainment."]
  • Col. 2:8 Beware lest any man [by his influence] spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
  • 1 Cor. 15:33 (KJV) Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners. (NIV) Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character.
  • Rom. 5:19 For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.
  • Jude 4 For certain men* whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are godless men, who change [warp, distort, falsely represent, situationally redefine, counterfeit, conditionally apply] the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord. [*men: anthropos {anth'-ro-pos}, generic, a human being, whether male or female]
  • Matt. 25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto [or for] one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto [or for] me.
  • Luke 17:2 It would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around his neck than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin. [cause by teaching or example]
  • Ps. 119:133 Direct my footsteps according to your word; let no sin rule over me.
  • John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
  • 1 Thess. 5:22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.


    As always, it is best to refer to the Findings/Scoring section -- the heart of the CAP analysis model -- for the most complete assessment possible of this movie.
    (The heart of the CAP Analysis Model)

    The Stepford Wives (2004) CAP Thermometers

    Wanton Violence/Crime (W)
  • attempted gunfire murder
  • trespassing, twice
  • admission of double murder
  • beheading of a robot
  • kissing a severed head

    Impudence/Hate (I)
  • four uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary
  • employing prostitutes and "hunks" to test the loyalty of a husband/wife pair as entertainment
  • a son telling his mother to chill
  • crude humor
  • (guilty) "Only if we get caught"
  • use of women as toys/tools extensively
  • lies repeatedly
  • wife deciding she can leave her husband with their kids

    Sexual Immorality (S)
  • camera angle and pose to force viewer on private parts, repeatedly
  • lesbian comment
  • dressing to maximize the human form and/or skin exposure, both male and female
  • admission of adultery
  • adultery, repeatedly
  • sexual innuendo, repeatedly
  • homosexual and lesbian presence, repeatedly
  • sounds of intercourse
  • sex talk, repeatedly
  • homosexual talk, repeatedly
  • excessive cleavage, repeatedly
  • perversion comment
  • anatomical reference
  • many nude mannequins

    Drugs/Alcohol (D):
  • drinking, twice
  • smoking, repeatedly

    Offense to God (O)
  • 11 uses of God's name in vain but without the four letter expletive
  • admission of adultery and adultery, twice
  • mockery of Jesus and faith
  • accepting of homosexual behavior
  • equating a homosexual relationship as being blessed and nurtured by the Lord

    Murder/Suicide (M)
  • none noted (the "murder" of the robot was incorporated in Violence above)


     Artist:   Album:   Title:   Lyric:  

    Single Christian Network

    Kids, Teens and Home Vertical Portal
     Click Here for a Quality Christian Site

    There are some in the entertainment industry who maintain that 1) violent programming is harmless because no studies exist that prove a connection between violent entertainment and aggressive behavior in children, and 2) young people know that television, movies, and video games are simply fantasy. Unfortunately, they are wrong on both accounts." And "Viewing violence may lead to real life violence." I applaud these associations for fortifying 1 Cor. 15:33. Read the rest of the story. From our more than eight years of study, I contend that other aberrant behaviors, attitudes, and expressions can be inserted in place of "violence" in that statement. Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a licensed psychologist and certified school psychologist concurs. For example, "Viewing arrogance against fair authority may lead to your kids defying you in real life." Or "Viewing sex may lead to sex in real life." Likewise and especially with impudence, hate and foul language. I further contend that any positive behavior can be inserted in place of "violence" with the same chance or likelihood of being a behavior template for the observer; of being incorporated into the behavior mechanics and/or coping skills of the observer. In choosing your entertainment, please consider carefully the "rest of the story" and our findings.

    Join Christian Banner Exchange Network Today!

    The ChildCare Action Project (CAP) is a nonprofit Christian ministry. We rely on public support. If you wish to contribute to the CAP, please send your donations to
    ChildCare Action Project
    Post Office Box 177
    Granbury, TX 76048-0177

    Your gifts are tax deductible in accordance with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Tax Codes. Please feel free to write to us.

    You are welcome to go to the
    CAP Reports page
    or go to the
    Top of the CAP Home Page
    or the
    CAP Site Map (Table of Contents)
    or leave me an email message or comment at

    Thank you for visiting us and may God bless you. Prayerfully, we will provide you with some of the most revealing commentary and investigative reporting you have ever read.

    In the name of Jesus:
    Lord, Master, Teacher, Savior, God.
    Tom Carder
    ChildCare Action Project (CAP): Christian Analysis of American Culture
    100% dependent on your tax-deductible financial support

    Copyright ChildCare Action Project (CAP) Ministry

    Since December 5, 2000

    The Fundamental Top 500

    Unique. Posted 5/27/04

    ChristianStats Counter TEST
    Unique. Posted 5/24/04

    Copyright ChildCare Action Project (CAP) Ministry
    A Nonprofit Christian Ministry EIN: 75-2607488