The Indian in the Cupboard (1995) was a most difficult movie to justify. It was clearly a movie written for children but in it was much programming to lower the threshold of acceptability at a younger and younger age and to increase desensitization to what used to be unacceptable behavior. For example, this movie presented nineteen scenes of exposure of what has been traditionally too much posterior flesh and frontal flesh between the beltline and the thigh. Granted, the American Indians wore outfits similar to the outfit worn by Little Bear in this movie, but if the amount of exposure of his flesh was not a deliberate attempt to show as much skin as the producers thought they could get away with, then why did Little Bear the man not wear as much clothing as Little Bear the figurine? The Greecians and the Corinthians did things even now unacceptable but does that excuse presenting such behavior to children in the name of entertainment?staircase while talking with someone |
| Please remember we believe that if even one of the six Investigation Area scores for a movie is equivalent to the CAP comparative baseline database scoring range for R, PG-13, or PG material, the entire movie should be regarded as so rated. For example, if only Wanton Violence/Crime earns a score equivalent to R but all other Investigation Areas earn a score equivalent to G, THERE IS R-RATED MATERIAL IN THE MOVIE AND YOUR KIDS WILL SEE IT AND HEAR IT IF THEY WATCH THE MOVIE! |